Atelier

Case Study · Fashion E-commerce · Design System

My Role
My Role

Design Lead

Design Lead

Client
Client

Atelier

Atelier

Type
Type

Brand identity · UX · UI · Design system

Brand identity · UX · UI · Design system

Timeline
Timeline

10 weeks

10 weeks

  • Strategy

  • Research

  • UX/UI design

  • Design systems

01Introduction

Atelier is a luxury fashion retailer offering curated collections from premium international brands through multiple digital touchpoints.

As the business expanded across five platforms, the customer experience became increasingly fragmented, with inconsistencies in navigation, shopping flows, and visual language. These differences made it difficult to deliver the cohesive, high-end experience customers expected while also slowing product scalability for internal teams. The challenge was not simply to redesign individual interfaces, but to unify the entire digital ecosystem under a shared product vision. Through user research, stakeholder collaboration, and strategic UX decisions, this project focused on creating a consistent commerce experience supported by a scalable design system. The result was a connected ecosystem that strengthened the customer journey while establishing a foundation for future growth.

RoleDesign Lead
Timeline10 weeks
PlatformsResponsive web · Mobile app · Admin portal
SurfacesWeb · Tablet · Responsive · Mobile app · Admin
DisciplinesBrand Identity · UX · UI · Design System · Art Direction
02The business challenge
The market

Saturated, and every store looks the same.

-30%
SALE
NEW IN
TRENDING
DiscountsTrend-driven collectionsVisually similar experiences
A new direct-to-consumer brand needed to
Establish trust
Show premium craftsmanship
Feel distinctive
Stay easy to shop
Product vision

Shopping that feels like a luxury boutique.

Timeless designEffortless browsingSeamless purchase→Lasting customer trust
03The problem
01

Business problem

Premium brands compete in crowded spaces where visual identity is diluted by promotional content.

02

User problem

Cluttered interfaces and inconsistent layouts make browsing overwhelming and pull focus from the products.

03

Market observation

Retailers prioritise campaigns and content density over clarity. Effective short term, but it compromises premium perception.

The opportunity

Design a shopping experience where the product becomes the hero. Swiss Design principles (structured grids, refined typography, generous whitespace, clear hierarchy) reduce cognitive load and help users decide with confidence.

04Goals & success metrics

What the product needed to achieve, and how success would be measured.

01

Create effortless product discovery

Clear navigation, intuitive filtering, consistent hierarchy.

Target · Higher product discovery rate
02

Build trust through simplicity

Reduce visual noise; let products become the primary focus.

Target · Higher user trust
03

Create a scalable design system

Reusable components that keep every touchpoint consistent.

Target · Design system adoption
04

Simplify the purchase journey

Fewer steps, predictable interactions from selection to checkout.

Target · Checkout completion rate
05Research approach

Understanding how premium shoppers evaluate products, build trust and decide.

5User interviews
3Competitive reviews
5Usability tests
2 weeksResearch window
4Key insights

User interviews

5 premium fashion shoppers · Ages 28–45 · Bought premium clothing online in the last 6 months

Competitive review

Fast fashion · Luxury retail · Premium DTC

Design references

Swiss grid systems · International Typographic Style · Editorial photography

Usability testing

Task-based · Browse → checkout · Cross-device consistency

What surprised me

I expected price to be the strongest trust signal. Instead, every participant judged the brand through its product photography before looking at price, specifications or reviews.

06Key findings

Four recurring patterns, directional rather than statistically representative, each informing a design decision.

100%
Finding

Quality is judged through product photography before price or details.

Opportunity

Lead with large, authentic product imagery; minimise interface distractions.

60%
Finding

Visual clutter reduced trust and increased abandonment.

Opportunity

Reduce promotional noise, simplify layouts, prioritise products over UI.

80%
Finding

Brand consistency broke down across digital touchpoints.

Opportunity

One design system with shared components across every platform.

100%
Finding

Shoppers preferred curated choices over overwhelming selection.

Opportunity

Curate the catalogue to reduce cognitive load and support confident decisions.

The pattern behind the patterns

The storefronts perceived as most premium embraced clarity over complexity. Premium wasn’t created by adding more. It emerged through restraint, hierarchy and deliberate design.

07Audience & persona

Three segments shaped the experience; one shopper from the primary segment guided most decisions.

Primary

Intentional buyers

Build a long-lasting wardrobe and carefully evaluate quality before purchasing.

Secondary

Busy professionals

Shop on mobile between meetings; value speed, clarity and convenience.

Occasional

Gift buyers

Purchase for others and rely on guidance, sizing and easy returns.

Lina Haddad
Creative Director · Beirut · 34

Lina Haddad

Buys few things, chosen well. Balances a demanding career with a busy personal life, preferring timeless pieces over trend-driven purchases.

“I want shopping to be calm, considered and reliable, so I can focus on the things that matter.”

Goals

Find quality pieces and brands she can trust · A calm shopping experience · Confident decisions · Fast, effortless checkout

Frustrations

Too many checkout steps · Confusing labels · No real reviews · Slow on mobile · Unclear delivery and returns

08Competitive position

Where the category is crowded, and the gap worth taking. The high-editorial, high-luxury quadrant was effectively empty.

The gap

Two rows nobody owned: grayscale-led imagery and true cross-surface consistency. Calm by design, consistent across every surface.

09Information architecture

A short, flat structure, nothing deeper than two levels, and the early layouts drawn on the grid.

Must

Editorial landing · 12-col shop grid · Grayscale plates · One-red add-to-bag · 3-step checkout

Should

Lookbook · Size guide · Fabric notes · Order tracking · Admin dashboard

Could

Saved fits & wishlist · Back-in-stock · Gift notes

Won’t

Promo banners · Badges · Carousels · Pop-ups · Colour photography in UI

10Design decisions

Each screen framed as a decision, not a feature: the problem it answered, what I chose, and the evidence behind it.

Landing, the editorial split
01

Landing, the editorial split

Problem60% had abandoned stores that felt loud, and that judgement forms in seconds.
DecisionHalf type, half plate: flush-left display type against one grayscale look, red spent on a single call to action.
EvidenceAll five described the store as “premium” or “confident” at the landing step.
The edit, a grid that frames
02

The edit, a grid that frames

ProblemA dense catalogue made garments compete with each other.
DecisionA calm grid with generous whitespace, filters instead of promotions, one garment per cell.
EvidenceParticipants scanned the edit without hesitation.
Product, plate + buy rail
03

Product, plate + buy rail

ProblemShoppers couldn’t judge fit or fabric; busy pages buried the garment.
DecisionThe garment gets the widest column; everything transactional sits in a compact side rail.
EvidenceMoving fabric notes and a colour swatch beside the plate removed size hesitation. All five completed browse→buy.
Checkout, short and distraction-free
04

Checkout, short and distraction-free

ProblemCheckouts that ask too much, too soon were a named abandonment trigger.
DecisionThree short steps, no upsells, totals always visible.
EvidenceMedian browse→pay of 4:10, two fewer steps than the three stores audited.
Admin, back of house, same house
05

Admin, back of house, same house

ProblemBack-of-house tools usually fall outside the brand system and rot fastest.
DecisionSales, orders and stock on the identical grid and type scale as the storefront.
EvidenceThe admin shipped from the same kit with zero new components drawn.
One accent colour, used sparingly
06

One accent colour, used sparingly

ProblemA near-monochrome system risked feeling flat; everything wanted to stand out.
DecisionA single accent, reserved for the primary action on each screen.
EvidenceParticipants consistently found the primary action without hesitation.
11Design system

One component kit: type, colour, spacing and states shared across every surface.

Typography · one family across five surfacesInter
Display / H164–104 · 700
Section heading H232–46 · 700
Card heading H320–26 · 700
Lead18–22 · 400 · 1.55 lh
Body14–16 · 400 · 1.6–1.7 lh
Caption12–13 · 500
Label / eyebrow11–12 · 700
Data14–18 · 600, prices, sizes, order numbers
Colour
Signal Red#C2261B · Primary
Ink#0E0E0E · Secondary
Paper#F5F4F0 · Tertiary
Secondary ink#4A4843
Muted#8B897F
Hairline#E6E4DF
White#FFFFFF
Cream#ECE6D9
Red pressed#9E1E15
A sample of the kit, as shipped
Add to bagContinueGhostyou@email.com
XSSML
−1+
ALLDAYEVENINGPAIDPENDING

Radius 0 on web and admin · one red per screen · hairlines divide, never boxes with shadow.

40+

components in one kit, from buttons and swatches to tables and charts

Storefront25
Store admin9
Mobile app9

Grid system

Web & admin: 12 columns, 24px gutters, 64px page margin, 1280px max width. Tablet: 6 columns. App: 4 columns. The same rhythm, collapsed: 12 → 6 → 4 → 2 by surface. Spacing in multiples of 4.

Icons

1.5px stroke · square terminals · 24px grid: bag, search, account, arrow. No filled icons, no decorative sets.

Accessibility

Ink on Paper 17.71:1 (AAA) · Muted on Paper 3.16:1 (AA Lg) · White on Red 5.85:1 (AA) · Red on Paper 5.37:1 (AA). No state depends on colour alone.

The one-red rule

If two things are red on a screen, one of them is wrong. The accent is reserved for the single most important action in view.

12Interface showreel

The finished screens across all five surfaces.

Landing
Landing
Shop
Shop
Product
Product
Bag
Bag
Checkout
Checkout
Search
Search
13The core path

Landing to completed order, and the small interactions that give feedback without getting in the way.

01

Land

One calm editorial frame. No carousel, no pop-up.

02

The edit

A grid that frames each garment; filters, not promotions.

03

Product

Plates, fabric notes and honest sizing build trust.

04

Bag

Totals and returns up front, no surprises.

05

Checkout

Three quiet steps; the single accent marks the final action.

Plate crossfade

Hover swaps the garment plate to the back view, a slow, even fade.

Bag slide-in

The bag enters as a quiet right-hand rail; the page dims, nothing bounces.

Checkout stepper

Steps advance with a single hairline sweep.

14Testing & validation

How the design was validated with real users, before development.

100%Completed the main scenarios (5 of 5)
4.6 / 5Task completion ease
5 / 5Would use the platform in future
0Critical usability issues

Method

Five in-depth interviews and five moderated remote validation sessions. The prototype was evaluated with users to verify the core shopping experience before development.

15Outcomes & impact

What the project achieved, what I learned, and where the system goes next.

5 / 5Participants completed checkout without moderator assistance.
3 stepsCheckout reduced from five steps to three.
100%Of body, button and accent text passes WCAG AA. Body clears AAA.
1Shared component library carried design-to-development handoff.
Read these as validation, not production metrics

As a new product, these come from five moderated usability tests plus a component-system and accessibility audit. Directional given the sample size, but enough to show the design holds up. The step reduction came from removing optional account creation and promo-code steps, not from compressing forms.

What worked

Writing the rules down, a single accent colour and a fixed grid, did more than good intentions. Decisions got faster because we stopped re-arguing them on every screen.

What I’d improve

I spent too long on the landing page early on. Next time I’d test the checkout and account flows sooner, before polishing the parts that photograph well.

Where it goes next

Seasonal lookbook: same grid, new plates · Saved fits & wishlist without gamification · French and Arabic storefronts, the flush-left system tested against RTL.

Atelier

Case Study · Fashion E-commerce · Design System

My Role
My Role

Design Lead

Design Lead

Client
Client

Atelier

Atelier

Type
Type

Brand identity · UX · UI · Design system

Brand identity · UX · UI · Design system

Timeline
Timeline

10 weeks

10 weeks

  • Strategy

  • Research

  • UX/UI design

  • Design systems

01Introduction

Atelier is a luxury fashion retailer offering curated collections from premium international brands through multiple digital touchpoints.

As the business expanded across five platforms, the customer experience became increasingly fragmented, with inconsistencies in navigation, shopping flows, and visual language. These differences made it difficult to deliver the cohesive, high-end experience customers expected while also slowing product scalability for internal teams. The challenge was not simply to redesign individual interfaces, but to unify the entire digital ecosystem under a shared product vision. Through user research, stakeholder collaboration, and strategic UX decisions, this project focused on creating a consistent commerce experience supported by a scalable design system. The result was a connected ecosystem that strengthened the customer journey while establishing a foundation for future growth.

RoleDesign Lead
Timeline10 weeks
PlatformsResponsive web · Mobile app · Admin portal
SurfacesWeb · Tablet · Responsive · Mobile app · Admin
DisciplinesBrand Identity · UX · UI · Design System · Art Direction
02The business challenge
The market

Saturated, and every store looks the same.

-30%
SALE
NEW IN
TRENDING
DiscountsTrend-driven collectionsVisually similar experiences
A new direct-to-consumer brand needed to
Establish trust
Show premium craftsmanship
Feel distinctive
Stay easy to shop
Product vision

Shopping that feels like a luxury boutique.

Timeless designEffortless browsingSeamless purchase→Lasting customer trust
03The problem
01

Business problem

Premium brands compete in crowded spaces where visual identity is diluted by promotional content.

02

User problem

Cluttered interfaces and inconsistent layouts make browsing overwhelming and pull focus from the products.

03

Market observation

Retailers prioritise campaigns and content density over clarity. Effective short term, but it compromises premium perception.

The opportunity

Design a shopping experience where the product becomes the hero. Swiss Design principles (structured grids, refined typography, generous whitespace, clear hierarchy) reduce cognitive load and help users decide with confidence.

04Goals & success metrics

What the product needed to achieve, and how success would be measured.

01

Create effortless product discovery

Clear navigation, intuitive filtering, consistent hierarchy.

Target · Higher product discovery rate
02

Build trust through simplicity

Reduce visual noise; let products become the primary focus.

Target · Higher user trust
03

Create a scalable design system

Reusable components that keep every touchpoint consistent.

Target · Design system adoption
04

Simplify the purchase journey

Fewer steps, predictable interactions from selection to checkout.

Target · Checkout completion rate
05Research approach

Understanding how premium shoppers evaluate products, build trust and decide.

5User interviews
3Competitive reviews
5Usability tests
2 weeksResearch window
4Key insights

User interviews

5 premium fashion shoppers · Ages 28–45 · Bought premium clothing online in the last 6 months

Competitive review

Fast fashion · Luxury retail · Premium DTC

Design references

Swiss grid systems · International Typographic Style · Editorial photography

Usability testing

Task-based · Browse → checkout · Cross-device consistency

What surprised me

I expected price to be the strongest trust signal. Instead, every participant judged the brand through its product photography before looking at price, specifications or reviews.

06Key findings

Four recurring patterns, directional rather than statistically representative, each informing a design decision.

100%
Finding

Quality is judged through product photography before price or details.

Opportunity

Lead with large, authentic product imagery; minimise interface distractions.

60%
Finding

Visual clutter reduced trust and increased abandonment.

Opportunity

Reduce promotional noise, simplify layouts, prioritise products over UI.

80%
Finding

Brand consistency broke down across digital touchpoints.

Opportunity

One design system with shared components across every platform.

100%
Finding

Shoppers preferred curated choices over overwhelming selection.

Opportunity

Curate the catalogue to reduce cognitive load and support confident decisions.

The pattern behind the patterns

The storefronts perceived as most premium embraced clarity over complexity. Premium wasn’t created by adding more. It emerged through restraint, hierarchy and deliberate design.

07Audience & persona

Three segments shaped the experience; one shopper from the primary segment guided most decisions.

Primary

Intentional buyers

Build a long-lasting wardrobe and carefully evaluate quality before purchasing.

Secondary

Busy professionals

Shop on mobile between meetings; value speed, clarity and convenience.

Occasional

Gift buyers

Purchase for others and rely on guidance, sizing and easy returns.

Lina Haddad
Creative Director · Beirut · 34

Lina Haddad

Buys few things, chosen well. Balances a demanding career with a busy personal life, preferring timeless pieces over trend-driven purchases.

“I want shopping to be calm, considered and reliable, so I can focus on the things that matter.”

Goals

Find quality pieces and brands she can trust · A calm shopping experience · Confident decisions · Fast, effortless checkout

Frustrations

Too many checkout steps · Confusing labels · No real reviews · Slow on mobile · Unclear delivery and returns

08Competitive position

Where the category is crowded, and the gap worth taking. The high-editorial, high-luxury quadrant was effectively empty.

The gap

Two rows nobody owned: grayscale-led imagery and true cross-surface consistency. Calm by design, consistent across every surface.

09Information architecture

A short, flat structure, nothing deeper than two levels, and the early layouts drawn on the grid.

Must

Editorial landing · 12-col shop grid · Grayscale plates · One-red add-to-bag · 3-step checkout

Should

Lookbook · Size guide · Fabric notes · Order tracking · Admin dashboard

Could

Saved fits & wishlist · Back-in-stock · Gift notes

Won’t

Promo banners · Badges · Carousels · Pop-ups · Colour photography in UI

10Design decisions

Each screen framed as a decision, not a feature: the problem it answered, what I chose, and the evidence behind it.

Landing, the editorial split
01

Landing, the editorial split

Problem60% had abandoned stores that felt loud, and that judgement forms in seconds.
DecisionHalf type, half plate: flush-left display type against one grayscale look, red spent on a single call to action.
EvidenceAll five described the store as “premium” or “confident” at the landing step.
The edit, a grid that frames
02

The edit, a grid that frames

ProblemA dense catalogue made garments compete with each other.
DecisionA calm grid with generous whitespace, filters instead of promotions, one garment per cell.
EvidenceParticipants scanned the edit without hesitation.
Product, plate + buy rail
03

Product, plate + buy rail

ProblemShoppers couldn’t judge fit or fabric; busy pages buried the garment.
DecisionThe garment gets the widest column; everything transactional sits in a compact side rail.
EvidenceMoving fabric notes and a colour swatch beside the plate removed size hesitation. All five completed browse→buy.
Checkout, short and distraction-free
04

Checkout, short and distraction-free

ProblemCheckouts that ask too much, too soon were a named abandonment trigger.
DecisionThree short steps, no upsells, totals always visible.
EvidenceMedian browse→pay of 4:10, two fewer steps than the three stores audited.
Admin, back of house, same house
05

Admin, back of house, same house

ProblemBack-of-house tools usually fall outside the brand system and rot fastest.
DecisionSales, orders and stock on the identical grid and type scale as the storefront.
EvidenceThe admin shipped from the same kit with zero new components drawn.
One accent colour, used sparingly
06

One accent colour, used sparingly

ProblemA near-monochrome system risked feeling flat; everything wanted to stand out.
DecisionA single accent, reserved for the primary action on each screen.
EvidenceParticipants consistently found the primary action without hesitation.
11Design system

One component kit: type, colour, spacing and states shared across every surface.

Typography · one family across five surfacesInter
Display / H164–104 · 700
Section heading H232–46 · 700
Card heading H320–26 · 700
Lead18–22 · 400 · 1.55 lh
Body14–16 · 400 · 1.6–1.7 lh
Caption12–13 · 500
Label / eyebrow11–12 · 700
Data14–18 · 600, prices, sizes, order numbers
Colour
Signal Red#C2261B · Primary
Ink#0E0E0E · Secondary
Paper#F5F4F0 · Tertiary
Secondary ink#4A4843
Muted#8B897F
Hairline#E6E4DF
White#FFFFFF
Cream#ECE6D9
Red pressed#9E1E15
A sample of the kit, as shipped
Add to bagContinueGhostyou@email.com
XSSML
−1+
ALLDAYEVENINGPAIDPENDING

Radius 0 on web and admin · one red per screen · hairlines divide, never boxes with shadow.

40+

components in one kit, from buttons and swatches to tables and charts

Storefront25
Store admin9
Mobile app9

Grid system

Web & admin: 12 columns, 24px gutters, 64px page margin, 1280px max width. Tablet: 6 columns. App: 4 columns. The same rhythm, collapsed: 12 → 6 → 4 → 2 by surface. Spacing in multiples of 4.

Icons

1.5px stroke · square terminals · 24px grid: bag, search, account, arrow. No filled icons, no decorative sets.

Accessibility

Ink on Paper 17.71:1 (AAA) · Muted on Paper 3.16:1 (AA Lg) · White on Red 5.85:1 (AA) · Red on Paper 5.37:1 (AA). No state depends on colour alone.

The one-red rule

If two things are red on a screen, one of them is wrong. The accent is reserved for the single most important action in view.

12Interface showreel

The finished screens across all five surfaces.

Landing
Landing
Shop
Shop
Product
Product
Bag
Bag
Checkout
Checkout
Search
Search
13The core path

Landing to completed order, and the small interactions that give feedback without getting in the way.

01

Land

One calm editorial frame. No carousel, no pop-up.

02

The edit

A grid that frames each garment; filters, not promotions.

03

Product

Plates, fabric notes and honest sizing build trust.

04

Bag

Totals and returns up front, no surprises.

05

Checkout

Three quiet steps; the single accent marks the final action.

Plate crossfade

Hover swaps the garment plate to the back view, a slow, even fade.

Bag slide-in

The bag enters as a quiet right-hand rail; the page dims, nothing bounces.

Checkout stepper

Steps advance with a single hairline sweep.

14Testing & validation

How the design was validated with real users, before development.

100%Completed the main scenarios (5 of 5)
4.6 / 5Task completion ease
5 / 5Would use the platform in future
0Critical usability issues

Method

Five in-depth interviews and five moderated remote validation sessions. The prototype was evaluated with users to verify the core shopping experience before development.

15Outcomes & impact

What the project achieved, what I learned, and where the system goes next.

5 / 5Participants completed checkout without moderator assistance.
3 stepsCheckout reduced from five steps to three.
100%Of body, button and accent text passes WCAG AA. Body clears AAA.
1Shared component library carried design-to-development handoff.
Read these as validation, not production metrics

As a new product, these come from five moderated usability tests plus a component-system and accessibility audit. Directional given the sample size, but enough to show the design holds up. The step reduction came from removing optional account creation and promo-code steps, not from compressing forms.

What worked

Writing the rules down, a single accent colour and a fixed grid, did more than good intentions. Decisions got faster because we stopped re-arguing them on every screen.

What I’d improve

I spent too long on the landing page early on. Next time I’d test the checkout and account flows sooner, before polishing the parts that photograph well.

Where it goes next

Seasonal lookbook: same grid, new plates · Saved fits & wishlist without gamification · French and Arabic storefronts, the flush-left system tested against RTL.

Menu

Atelier

Case Study · Fashion E-commerce · Design System

My Role
My Role

Design Lead

Design Lead

Client
Client

Atelier

Atelier

Type
Type

Brand identity · UX · UI · Design system

Brand identity · UX · UI · Design system

Timeline
Timeline

10 weeks

10 weeks

  • Strategy

  • Research

  • UX/UI design

  • Design systems

01Introduction

Atelier is a luxury fashion retailer offering curated collections from premium international brands through multiple digital touchpoints.

As the business expanded across five platforms, the customer experience became increasingly fragmented, with inconsistencies in navigation, shopping flows, and visual language. These differences made it difficult to deliver the cohesive, high-end experience customers expected while also slowing product scalability for internal teams. The challenge was not simply to redesign individual interfaces, but to unify the entire digital ecosystem under a shared product vision. Through user research, stakeholder collaboration, and strategic UX decisions, this project focused on creating a consistent commerce experience supported by a scalable design system. The result was a connected ecosystem that strengthened the customer journey while establishing a foundation for future growth.

RoleDesign Lead
Timeline10 weeks
PlatformsResponsive web · Mobile app · Admin portal
SurfacesWeb · Tablet · Responsive · Mobile app · Admin
DisciplinesBrand Identity · UX · UI · Design System · Art Direction
02The business challenge
The market

Saturated, and every store looks the same.

-30%
SALE
NEW IN
TRENDING
DiscountsTrend-driven collectionsVisually similar experiences
A new direct-to-consumer brand needed to
Establish trust
Show premium craftsmanship
Feel distinctive
Stay easy to shop
Product vision

Shopping that feels like a luxury boutique.

Timeless designEffortless browsingSeamless purchase→Lasting customer trust
03The problem
01

Business problem

Premium brands compete in crowded spaces where visual identity is diluted by promotional content.

02

User problem

Cluttered interfaces and inconsistent layouts make browsing overwhelming and pull focus from the products.

03

Market observation

Retailers prioritise campaigns and content density over clarity. Effective short term, but it compromises premium perception.

The opportunity

Design a shopping experience where the product becomes the hero. Swiss Design principles (structured grids, refined typography, generous whitespace, clear hierarchy) reduce cognitive load and help users decide with confidence.

04Goals & success metrics

What the product needed to achieve, and how success would be measured.

01

Create effortless product discovery

Clear navigation, intuitive filtering, consistent hierarchy.

Target · Higher product discovery rate
02

Build trust through simplicity

Reduce visual noise; let products become the primary focus.

Target · Higher user trust
03

Create a scalable design system

Reusable components that keep every touchpoint consistent.

Target · Design system adoption
04

Simplify the purchase journey

Fewer steps, predictable interactions from selection to checkout.

Target · Checkout completion rate
05Research approach

Understanding how premium shoppers evaluate products, build trust and decide.

5User interviews
3Competitive reviews
5Usability tests
2 weeksResearch window
4Key insights

User interviews

5 premium fashion shoppers · Ages 28–45 · Bought premium clothing online in the last 6 months

Competitive review

Fast fashion · Luxury retail · Premium DTC

Design references

Swiss grid systems · International Typographic Style · Editorial photography

Usability testing

Task-based · Browse → checkout · Cross-device consistency

What surprised me

I expected price to be the strongest trust signal. Instead, every participant judged the brand through its product photography before looking at price, specifications or reviews.

06Key findings

Four recurring patterns, directional rather than statistically representative, each informing a design decision.

100%
Finding

Quality is judged through product photography before price or details.

Opportunity

Lead with large, authentic product imagery; minimise interface distractions.

60%
Finding

Visual clutter reduced trust and increased abandonment.

Opportunity

Reduce promotional noise, simplify layouts, prioritise products over UI.

80%
Finding

Brand consistency broke down across digital touchpoints.

Opportunity

One design system with shared components across every platform.

100%
Finding

Shoppers preferred curated choices over overwhelming selection.

Opportunity

Curate the catalogue to reduce cognitive load and support confident decisions.

The pattern behind the patterns

The storefronts perceived as most premium embraced clarity over complexity. Premium wasn’t created by adding more. It emerged through restraint, hierarchy and deliberate design.

07Audience & persona

Three segments shaped the experience; one shopper from the primary segment guided most decisions.

Primary

Intentional buyers

Build a long-lasting wardrobe and carefully evaluate quality before purchasing.

Secondary

Busy professionals

Shop on mobile between meetings; value speed, clarity and convenience.

Occasional

Gift buyers

Purchase for others and rely on guidance, sizing and easy returns.

Lina Haddad
Creative Director · Beirut · 34

Lina Haddad

Buys few things, chosen well. Balances a demanding career with a busy personal life, preferring timeless pieces over trend-driven purchases.

“I want shopping to be calm, considered and reliable, so I can focus on the things that matter.”

Goals

Find quality pieces and brands she can trust · A calm shopping experience · Confident decisions · Fast, effortless checkout

Frustrations

Too many checkout steps · Confusing labels · No real reviews · Slow on mobile · Unclear delivery and returns

08Competitive position

Where the category is crowded, and the gap worth taking. The high-editorial, high-luxury quadrant was effectively empty.

The gap

Two rows nobody owned: grayscale-led imagery and true cross-surface consistency. Calm by design, consistent across every surface.

09Information architecture

A short, flat structure, nothing deeper than two levels, and the early layouts drawn on the grid.

Must

Editorial landing · 12-col shop grid · Grayscale plates · One-red add-to-bag · 3-step checkout

Should

Lookbook · Size guide · Fabric notes · Order tracking · Admin dashboard

Could

Saved fits & wishlist · Back-in-stock · Gift notes

Won’t

Promo banners · Badges · Carousels · Pop-ups · Colour photography in UI

10Design decisions

Each screen framed as a decision, not a feature: the problem it answered, what I chose, and the evidence behind it.

Landing, the editorial split
01

Landing, the editorial split

Problem60% had abandoned stores that felt loud, and that judgement forms in seconds.
DecisionHalf type, half plate: flush-left display type against one grayscale look, red spent on a single call to action.
EvidenceAll five described the store as “premium” or “confident” at the landing step.
The edit, a grid that frames
02

The edit, a grid that frames

ProblemA dense catalogue made garments compete with each other.
DecisionA calm grid with generous whitespace, filters instead of promotions, one garment per cell.
EvidenceParticipants scanned the edit without hesitation.
Product, plate + buy rail
03

Product, plate + buy rail

ProblemShoppers couldn’t judge fit or fabric; busy pages buried the garment.
DecisionThe garment gets the widest column; everything transactional sits in a compact side rail.
EvidenceMoving fabric notes and a colour swatch beside the plate removed size hesitation. All five completed browse→buy.
Checkout, short and distraction-free
04

Checkout, short and distraction-free

ProblemCheckouts that ask too much, too soon were a named abandonment trigger.
DecisionThree short steps, no upsells, totals always visible.
EvidenceMedian browse→pay of 4:10, two fewer steps than the three stores audited.
Admin, back of house, same house
05

Admin, back of house, same house

ProblemBack-of-house tools usually fall outside the brand system and rot fastest.
DecisionSales, orders and stock on the identical grid and type scale as the storefront.
EvidenceThe admin shipped from the same kit with zero new components drawn.
One accent colour, used sparingly
06

One accent colour, used sparingly

ProblemA near-monochrome system risked feeling flat; everything wanted to stand out.
DecisionA single accent, reserved for the primary action on each screen.
EvidenceParticipants consistently found the primary action without hesitation.
11Design system

One component kit: type, colour, spacing and states shared across every surface.

Typography · one family across five surfacesInter
Display / H164–104 · 700
Section heading H232–46 · 700
Card heading H320–26 · 700
Lead18–22 · 400 · 1.55 lh
Body14–16 · 400 · 1.6–1.7 lh
Caption12–13 · 500
Label / eyebrow11–12 · 700
Data14–18 · 600, prices, sizes, order numbers
Colour
Signal Red#C2261B · Primary
Ink#0E0E0E · Secondary
Paper#F5F4F0 · Tertiary
Secondary ink#4A4843
Muted#8B897F
Hairline#E6E4DF
White#FFFFFF
Cream#ECE6D9
Red pressed#9E1E15
A sample of the kit, as shipped
Add to bagContinueGhostyou@email.com
XSSML
−1+
ALLDAYEVENINGPAIDPENDING

Radius 0 on web and admin · one red per screen · hairlines divide, never boxes with shadow.

40+

components in one kit, from buttons and swatches to tables and charts

Storefront25
Store admin9
Mobile app9

Grid system

Web & admin: 12 columns, 24px gutters, 64px page margin, 1280px max width. Tablet: 6 columns. App: 4 columns. The same rhythm, collapsed: 12 → 6 → 4 → 2 by surface. Spacing in multiples of 4.

Icons

1.5px stroke · square terminals · 24px grid: bag, search, account, arrow. No filled icons, no decorative sets.

Accessibility

Ink on Paper 17.71:1 (AAA) · Muted on Paper 3.16:1 (AA Lg) · White on Red 5.85:1 (AA) · Red on Paper 5.37:1 (AA). No state depends on colour alone.

The one-red rule

If two things are red on a screen, one of them is wrong. The accent is reserved for the single most important action in view.

12Interface showreel

The finished screens across all five surfaces.

Landing
Landing
Shop
Shop
Product
Product
Bag
Bag
Checkout
Checkout
Search
Search
13The core path

Landing to completed order, and the small interactions that give feedback without getting in the way.

01

Land

One calm editorial frame. No carousel, no pop-up.

02

The edit

A grid that frames each garment; filters, not promotions.

03

Product

Plates, fabric notes and honest sizing build trust.

04

Bag

Totals and returns up front, no surprises.

05

Checkout

Three quiet steps; the single accent marks the final action.

Plate crossfade

Hover swaps the garment plate to the back view, a slow, even fade.

Bag slide-in

The bag enters as a quiet right-hand rail; the page dims, nothing bounces.

Checkout stepper

Steps advance with a single hairline sweep.

14Testing & validation

How the design was validated with real users, before development.

100%Completed the main scenarios (5 of 5)
4.6 / 5Task completion ease
5 / 5Would use the platform in future
0Critical usability issues

Method

Five in-depth interviews and five moderated remote validation sessions. The prototype was evaluated with users to verify the core shopping experience before development.

15Outcomes & impact

What the project achieved, what I learned, and where the system goes next.

5 / 5Participants completed checkout without moderator assistance.
3 stepsCheckout reduced from five steps to three.
100%Of body, button and accent text passes WCAG AA. Body clears AAA.
1Shared component library carried design-to-development handoff.
Read these as validation, not production metrics

As a new product, these come from five moderated usability tests plus a component-system and accessibility audit. Directional given the sample size, but enough to show the design holds up. The step reduction came from removing optional account creation and promo-code steps, not from compressing forms.

What worked

Writing the rules down, a single accent colour and a fixed grid, did more than good intentions. Decisions got faster because we stopped re-arguing them on every screen.

What I’d improve

I spent too long on the landing page early on. Next time I’d test the checkout and account flows sooner, before polishing the parts that photograph well.

Where it goes next

Seasonal lookbook: same grid, new plates · Saved fits & wishlist without gamification · French and Arabic storefronts, the flush-left system tested against RTL.