01

Introduction

Atelier is a luxury fashion retailer offering curated collections from premium international brands through multiple digital touchpoints. As the business expanded across five platforms, the customer experience became increasingly fragmented, with inconsistencies in navigation, shopping flows, and visual language. These differences made it difficult to deliver the cohesive, high-end experience customers expected while also slowing product scalability for internal teams. The challenge was not simply to redesign individual interfaces, but to unify the entire digital ecosystem under a shared product vision. Through user research, stakeholder collaboration, and strategic UX decisions, this project focused on creating a consistent commerce experience supported by a scalable design system. The result was a connected ecosystem that strengthened the customer journey while establishing a foundation for future growth.

02

Overview

Role

Design Lead

Timeline

10 weeks

Platforms

Responsive web · Mobile app · Admin portal

The business challenge

The premium fashion e-commerce market is highly saturated, with many brands competing through discounts, trend-driven collections and visually similar shopping experiences. As a new direct-to-consumer brand, ATELIER needed to establish trust, communicate premium craftsmanship and create a distinctive digital experience that reflected its brand values while remaining easy to shop.

03 — Product vision

Create a premium digital shopping experience where discovering fashion feels as intentional and refined as visiting a luxury boutique — combining timeless design, effortless browsing, and a seamless purchase journey that builds lasting customer trust.

04

The problem

01

Business problem

Premium brands compete in crowded spaces where visual identity is diluted by promotional content.

02

User problem

Cluttered interfaces and inconsistent layouts make browsing overwhelming and pull focus from the products.

04

Market observation

Retailers prioritise campaigns and content density over clarity — effective short-term, but it compromises premium perception.

The opportunity

Design a shopping experience where the product becomes the hero. Swiss Design principles — structured grids, refined typography, generous whitespace, clear hierarchy — reduce cognitive load and help users decide with confidence.

05

Goals & success metrics

What the product needed to achieve, and how success would be measured.

Create effortless product discovery

Clear navigation, intuitive filtering, consistent hierarchy.

Target

Higher product discovery rate

Build trust through simplicity

Reduce visual noise; let products become the primary focus.

Target

Higher user trust

Create a scalable design system

Reusable components that keep every touchpoint consistent.

Target

Design system adoption

Simplify the purchase journey

Fewer steps, predictable interactions from selection to checkout.

Target

Checkout completion rate

Atelier landing

06

Research approach

Understanding how premium shoppers evaluate products, build trust and decide.

5

User interviews

3

Competitive reviews

5

Usability tests

2 weeks

Research window

4

Key insights

What surprised me

I expected price to be the strongest trust signal. Instead, every participant judged the brand through its product photography before looking at price, specifications or reviews.

User interviews

5 premium fashion shoppers · Ages 28–45 · Bought premium clothing online in the last 6 months

Competitive review

Fast fashion · Luxury retail · Premium DTC

Design references

Swiss grid systems · International Typographic Style · Editorial photography

Usability testing

Task-based · Browse → checkout · Cross-device consistency

07

Key findings

Four recurring patterns — directional rather than statistically representative, each informing a design decision.

100%

Finding

Quality is judged through product photography before price or details.

Opportunity

Lead with large, authentic product imagery; minimise interface distractions.

60%

Finding

Visual clutter reduced trust and increased abandonment.

Opportunity

Reduce promotional noise, simplify layouts, prioritise products over UI.

80%

Finding

Brand consistency broke down across digital touchpoints.

Opportunity

One design system with shared components across every platform.

100%

Finding

Shoppers preferred curated choices over overwhelming selection.

Opportunity

Curate the catalogue to reduce cognitive load and support confident decisions.

The pattern behind the patterns

The storefronts perceived as most premium embraced clarity over complexity. Premium wasn’t created by adding more — it emerged through restraint, hierarchy and deliberate design.

08

Audience & persona

Three segments shaped the experience; one shopper from the primary segment guided most decisions.

Primary

Intentional buyers

Build a long-lasting wardrobe and carefully evaluate quality before purchasing.

Secondary

Busy professionals

Shop on mobile between meetings; value speed, clarity and convenience.

Occasional

Gift buyers

Purchase for others and rely on guidance, sizing and easy returns.

Lina Haddad

Creative Director · Beirut · 34

Lina Haddad

Buys few things, chosen well. Balances a demanding career with a busy personal life, preferring timeless pieces over trend-driven purchases.

“I want shopping to be calm, considered and reliable — so I can focus on the things that matter.”

Goals

Find quality pieces and brands she can trust · A calm shopping experience · Confident decisions · Fast, effortless checkout

Frustrations

Too many checkout steps · Confusing labels · No real reviews · Slow on mobile · Unclear delivery and returns

09

Competitive position

Where the category is crowded, and the gap worth taking — the high-editorial / high-luxury quadrant was effectively empty.

Market positioning

The gap

Two rows nobody owned — grayscale-led imagery and true cross-surface consistency. Calm by design, consistent across every surface.

10

Information architecture

A short, flat structure — nothing deeper than two levels — and the early layouts drawn on the grid.

Site map
Low-fidelity wireframes

Must

Editorial landing · 12-col shop grid · Grayscale plates · One-red add-to-bag · 3-step checkout

Should

Lookbook · Size guide · Fabric notes · Order tracking · Admin dashboard

Could

Saved fits & wishlist · Back-in-stock · Gift notes

Won’t

Promo banners · Badges · Carousels · Pop-ups · Colour photography in UI

11

Design decisions

Each screen framed as a decision, not a feature — the problem it answered, what I chose, and the evidence behind it.

01

Landing — the editorial split

Problem

60% had abandoned stores that felt loud, and that judgement forms in seconds.

Decision

Half type, half plate: flush-left display type against one grayscale look, red spent on a single call to action.

Evidence

All five described the store as “premium” or “confident” at the landing step.

Landing — the editorial split
The edit — a grid that frames

02

The edit — a grid that frames

Problem

A dense catalogue made garments compete with each other.

Decision

A calm grid with generous whitespace, filters instead of promotions, one garment per cell.

Evidence

Participants scanned the edit without hesitation.

03

Product — plate + buy rail

Problem

Shoppers couldn’t judge fit or fabric; busy pages buried the garment.

Decision

The garment gets the widest column; everything transactional sits in a compact side rail.

Evidence

Moving fabric notes and a colour swatch beside the plate removed size hesitation — all five completed browse→buy.

Product — plate + buy rail
Checkout — short and distraction-free

04

Checkout — short and distraction-free

Problem

Checkouts that ask too much, too soon were a named abandonment trigger.

Decision

Three short steps, no upsells, totals always visible.

Evidence

Median browse→pay of 4:10, two fewer steps than the three stores audited.

05

Admin — back of house, same house

Problem

Back-of-house tools usually fall outside the brand system and rot fastest.

Decision

Sales, orders and stock on the identical grid and type scale as the storefront.

Evidence

The admin shipped from the same kit with zero new components drawn.

Admin — back of house, same house
One accent colour, used sparingly

06

One accent colour, used sparingly

Problem

A near-monochrome system risked feeling flat; everything wanted to stand out.

Decision

A single accent, reserved for the primary action on each screen.

Evidence

Participants consistently found the primary action without hesitation.

12

Design system

One component kit — type, colour, spacing and states shared across every surface.

Typography & Colors

Display — Inter

Inter

Display / H1 · 64–104 · 700

Section heading H2 · 32–46 · 700

Card heading H3 · 20–26 · 700

Case covers, landing statements, band titles — flush-left, single family.
Body — Inter

Inter

Lead · 18–22 · 400 · 1.55 lh

Body · 14–16 · 400 · 1.6–1.7 lh

Caption · 12–13 · 500

Label / eyebrow · 11–12 · 700

Data · 14–18 · 600 — prices, sizes, order numbers

Copy, fabric notes, kickers and chips — one type family across five surfaces.
Primary
Signal Red · #C2261B
Secondary
Ink · #0E0E0E
Tertiary
Paper · #F5F4F0

Palette

Secondary ink
#4A4843
Muted
#8B897F
Hairline
#E6E4DF
White
#FFFFFF
Cream
#ECE6D9
Red pressed
#9E1E15
Components — on paper, as shipped

Add to bag

Continue

Ghost

you@email.com

XS

S

M

L

Radius 0 on web and admin · one red per screen · hairlines divide, never boxes with shadow.

Grid System

Web & admin — 12 columns

24px gutters · 64px page margin · 1280px max width

Tablet — 6 columns

The same rhythm, collapsed — 12 → 6 → 4 → 2 by surface

App — 4 columns

Spacing in multiples of 4 · 1px hairlines divide — never boxes with shadow

Icons

1.5px stroke · square terminals · 24px grid — bag, search, account, arrow. No filled icons, no decorative sets.

The one-red rule

If two things are red on a screen, one of them is wrong. The accent is reserved for the single most important action in view.

Accessibility

Ink on Paper 17.71:1 (AAA) · Muted on Paper 3.16:1 (AA Lg) · White on Red 5.85:1 (AA) · Red on Paper 5.37:1 (AA). No state depends on colour alone.

13

Interface showreel

The finished screens across all five surfaces.

Web desktop · 1440

atelier-01-web-desktop-1440-01-landing
atelier-02-web-desktop-1440-02-shop
atelier-03-web-desktop-1440-03-product
atelier-04-web-desktop-1440-04-bag
atelier-05-web-desktop-1440-05-checkout
atelier-26-web-desktop-1440-06-search

Tablet · 834

atelier-06-tablet-834-01-landing
atelier-08-tablet-834-03-product
atelier-10-tablet-834-05-checkout

Responsive web · 430

atelier-11-responsive-web-430-01-landing
atelier-12-responsive-web-430-02-shop
atelier-13-responsive-web-430-03-product
atelier-14-responsive-web-430-04-bag
atelier-15-responsive-web-430-05-checkout
atelier-28-responsive-web-430-06-search

Mobile app · 390

atelier-16-mobile-app-390-01-home
atelier-17-mobile-app-390-02-shop
atelier-18-mobile-app-390-03-product
atelier-19-mobile-app-390-04-bag
atelier-20-mobile-app-390-05-you

Store admin · 1440

atelier-21-store-admin-1440-01-dashboard
atelier-22-store-admin-1440-02-orders
atelier-23-store-admin-1440-03-products
atelier-24-store-admin-1440-04-inventory
atelier-25-store-admin-1440-05-customers

14

The core path

Landing to completed order, and the small interactions that give feedback without getting in the way.

01

Land

One calm editorial frame — no carousel, no pop-up.

02

The edit

A grid that frames each garment; filters, not promotions.

03

Product

Plates, fabric notes and honest sizing build trust.

04

Bag

Totals and returns up front — no surprises.

05

Checkout

Three quiet steps; the single accent marks the final action.

Plate crossfade

Hover swaps the garment plate to the back view — a slow, even fade.

Bag slide-in

The bag enters as a quiet right-hand rail; the page dims, nothing bounces.

Checkout stepper

Steps advance with a single hairline sweep.

15

Testing & validation

How the design was validated with real users, before development.

100%

Completed the main scenarios (5 of 5)

4.6 / 5

Task completion ease

5 / 5

Would use the platform in future

0

Critical usability issues

Method

Five in-depth interviews and five moderated remote validation sessions. The prototype was evaluated with users to verify the core shopping experience before development.

16

Outcomes & impact

What the project achieved, what I learned, and where the system goes next.

5 / 5

Participants completed checkout without moderator assistance.

3 steps

Checkout reduced from five steps to three.

100%

Of body, button and accent text passes WCAG AA — body clears AAA.

1

Shared component library carried design-to-development handoff.

Read these as validation, not production metrics

As a new product, these come from five moderated usability tests plus a component-system and accessibility audit — directional given the sample size, but enough to show the design holds up. The step reduction came from removing optional account creation and promo-code steps, not from compressing forms.

What worked

Writing the rules down — a single accent colour and a fixed grid — did more than good intentions. Decisions got faster because we stopped re-arguing them on every screen.

What I’d improve

I spent too long on the landing page early on. Next time I’d test the checkout and account flows sooner, before polishing the parts that photograph well.

Where it goes next

Seasonal lookbook — same grid, new plates · Saved fits & wishlist without gamification · French and Arabic storefronts, the flush-left system tested against RTL.

Thank you for scrolling through the transformation.

If this way of working resonates with you, I’d love to talk about your product.

Let’s connect
fouad.muhammed.g@gmail.com